The US diplomat named an acceptable version of the agreement between Russia and Ukraine According to the US

Chargé d'Affairesin Ukraine, Washington is counting on a diplomatic solution to the conflict,however, it must be acceptable to Kyiv first United States Chargé d'Affaires in Ukraine Christina Quinn (center)

The United States is ready to support a peace agreement between Moscow and Kyiv, in which Ukraine will emerge victorious from the conflict. This was stated by Chargé d'Affaires of the United States in Ukraine Christina Quinn on ICTV.

“I would like to see a diplomatic solution to this [conflict], but obviously there cannot be a diplomatic solution where Ukraine loses and RUSSIA wins. This is an unacceptable way to end this unilateral aggression. I would like Ukraine and Russia to reach an amicable agreement that would be acceptable to Ukraine. And if it is like that, then the United States will support it, ”she said.

See also Lavrov on Ukraine's readiness to acquire a non-bloc and neutral status 00:42

Earlier on May 14, Russian Ambassador to the United States Anatoly Antonov said that Russian diplomats "firmly and clearly" told the United States that Moscow's surrender in Ukraine was impossible. “The Americans, in principle, are pushing us to negotiate from all sides, but under certain conditions, and I would name three such conditions. This is, firstly, to stop hostilities in the course of a special military operation. The second is to withdraw our troops behind the line until February 24 of this year. And the third is “to repent for everything they have done,” he said, and specified that “such a surrender will never happen.”

Antonov also expressed confidence that all the tasks set by Russian President Vladimir Putin for the armed forces would be fulfilled.

Medvedev said that Zelensky "does not need any peace treaty" Politics

Negotiations between Russia and Ukraine on a peace agreement and security guarantees for Kyiv began a few days after the start of the special operation. Several meetings were held face-to-face in late February - early March. On March 29, delegations from both sides met in Istanbul, then Ukraine submitted written proposals to Moscow to resolve the conflict.

Read on RBC Pro Pro x The Economist Why economists and ordinary people estimate inflation differently ArticlesPro Philip Kotler's Digital Marketing Principles: How to Work with a Client Pro Articles "Already Abroad, but I Can Recommend a Friend":how to curb IT churn Instructions Pro Former HEAD of Tinkoff Oliver Hughes:the main thing for a banker is not to be a bankeremptied due to sanctions and the departure of players Forecasts Pro Risks of staff cuts:how not to fall into the trap Instructions Pro So-so motivation:why you should not tie salary to KPI Research Pro Excessive optimism and other traps,that prevent getting out of the crisis Instructions

According to the head of the Russian delegation, Vladimir Medinsky, Kyiv confirmed Ukraine's desire to remain a neutral and non-nuclear state. The theses on the status of Donbass and Crimea have disappeared from the list of provisions on security guarantees. In addition, Kyiv decided not to return the peninsula under its control by military means.

In early April, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said that after the publication of materials on the situation in the Ukrainian city of Bucha, Kyiv tried to interrupt the negotiation process and abandon its proposals. Since then, the Russian authorities have repeatedly said that negotiations have stalled. On May 11, the press secretary of the Russian president, Dmitry Peskov, described them as "sluggish and ineffective", and a day later said that there was "nothing to brag about" as a result of the meetings.

In turn, the head of US national intelligence, Avril Haynes, said that Washington sees no prospects for successful negotiations around the situation in Ukraine in the near future. “Given that both Russia and Ukraine believe they can continue to make military gains, we see no viable way forward through negotiations – at least in the short term,” she said. In addition, in her opinion, in Ukraine there is the possibility of a “potential escalation” in the next few months.